The table shows whether employers in each country are subject to social security, payroll or employer audits in which the authorities can review the social security coverage of employees who worked abroad.
This is relevant for A1 compliance because an employee may temporarily work in another country while remaining covered by the social security system of the home country.
For example, a UK employee working temporarily from Cyprus may remain subject to UK social security. The employer therefore continues paying UK National Insurance contributions during the period abroad. The A1 certificate documents that UK social security legislation continues to apply despite the employee physically working in Cyprus.
The same principle applies across the EU/EEA, Switzerland and the UK.
During a later employer or social security audit, the home-country authority may review whether continued home-country social security coverage during periods of work abroad was correct. The A1 certificate provides the evidence for that coverage.
This means that A1 compliance is not only relevant because an authority in the country of work might request the certificate. It can also become relevant later during an audit of the employer in the employee's home country.
The table works in both directions: the same authorities audit both the home-country case (an employee insured in that country who works abroad) and the inbound case (an employee working in that country while insured elsewhere, where the foreign A1 certificate proves that no local contributions were due).
For employers with employees working abroad, the practical consequence is therefore clear: where an A1 is required, the employer should obtain and retain it as part of its social security documentation for the relevant period abroad.
The audit frequency differs significantly between countries. Some countries carry out periodic employer audits, while others use risk-based selection, data analysis, complaints or specific audit campaigns. However, in each case identified in the table, the employer's social security treatment of employees may be subject to review.
Country | Audit / inspection possible? | Authority | Legal basis | Frequency / trigger, where known |
Austria | YES | Tax authorities / ÖGK – GPLB | Sec. 41a ASVG; PLABG | Audit planning and specific concerns. No fixed four-year cycle. |
Belgium | YES | Social Inspectorate / NSSO | Social Criminal Code, Arts. 22–49 | Ex officio, complaints, authority referrals, judicial requests, campaigns or work accidents. |
Bulgaria | YES | National Revenue Agency (NRA/NAP) | Tax and Social Security Procedure Code | Tax and social security controls. No fixed statutory audit cycle identified. |
Croatia | YES | Tax Administration / competent social security and inspection authorities | Tax and compulsory contribution legislation | Employer and contribution audits. Specific selection criteria not conclusively verified. |
Cyprus | YES | Ministry of Labour and Social Insurance / Labour Inspectorate | Social Insurance Law 59(I)/2010; Labour Inspectorate Law 88(I)/2020 | Monthly targeted campaigns, complaints, proactive inspections and risk indicators. |
Czech Republic | YES | Czech Social Security Administration / District Social Security Administration | Act No. 582/1991 Coll.; Act No. 589/1992 Coll. | Employer audits covering registration and social security contributions. No fixed cycle verified. |
Denmark | YES | Danish Tax Administration | Kildeskatteloven Sec. 86 | Document-based controls and business visits. No general fixed cycle identified. |
Estonia | YES | Tax and Customs Board (MTA) | Taxation Act Secs. 73 et seq.; Social Tax Act | Tax audits may cover specific taxes and factual issues, including social tax. No fixed cycle. |
Finland | YES | Finnish Centre for Pensions / pension insurance institutions | Employees Pensions Act (TyEL), Sec. 188 | Statutory employer audit powers plus monitoring through income register data. No fixed cycle. |
France | YES | URSSAF | Code de la sécurité sociale, Arts. L243-7 et seq.; R243-59 et seq. | Audit programmes and risk / case selection. No fixed cycle for every employer. |
Germany | YES | German Pension Insurance | Sec. 28p(1) SGB IV | Every employer is audited at least every four years. Earlier audits are possible in specific cases. |
Greece | YES | e-EFKA / PEKA | Law 4445/2016 and related social security audit provisions | Regular and extraordinary audits covering employer declarations, payroll and insurance treatment. |
Hungary | YES | NAV | Act CL of 2017 on the Rules of Taxation and social contribution legislation | Tax and contribution audits. No general fixed audit cycle verified. |
Ireland | YES | Revenue Commissioners | Revenue legislation and Code of Practice for Revenue Compliance Interventions | Risk-based. Level 2 Risk Reviews and audits may cover PAYE, PRSI and USC. |
Italy | YES | National Labour Inspectorate (INL) / National Social Security Institute (INPS) | Legislative Decree 149/2015 and social security legislation | Audit programmes, targeted controls and case-specific inspections. No fixed cycle. |
Latvia | YES | State Revenue Service (VID) | Law on Taxes and Duties and state social insurance legislation | Tax controls and audits. May be triggered by inconsistencies or information from other authorities. |
Lithuania | YES | Sodra / State Tax Inspectorate | Law on State Social Insurance; Law on Tax Administration | Employer and social security audits. No general fixed cycle. |
Luxembourg | YES | CCSS / competent social security authorities | Code de la sécurité sociale | Employer reporting and contribution compliance may be reviewed. No fixed audit cycle identified. |
Malta | YES | Commissioner for Revenue / Department of Social Security | Social Security Act, Cap. 318 and tax legislation | Payroll and contribution compliance controls. Exact audit triggers not conclusively verified. |
Netherlands | YES | Dutch Tax and Customs Administration | Algemene wet inzake rijksbelastingen (AWR) | Boekenonderzoek, business visits and other controls. Audits may focus on specific periods or issues. |
Poland | YES | ZUS | Arts. 86 et seq. of the Social Insurance System Act | Audit planning and risk selection. Extraordinary audits are also possible. |
Portugal | YES | Social Security Inspection Services | Social Security Contributions Code and inspection legislation | Employer and contribution audits. No general fixed cycle verified. |
Romania | YES | ANAF | Fiscal Procedure Code, Law 207/2015, Arts. 113–119 | Risk-based. General or partial fiscal inspections based on identified fiscal risk. |
Slovakia | YES | Social Insurance Agency | Act No. 461/2003 Coll. on Social Insurance | Centrally prepared six-month audit plans. Extraordinary audits may follow reports or information received. |
Slovenia | YES | Financial Administration (FURS) | Tax Procedure Act (ZDavP-2) | Tax audits may cover social security contributions and may be expanded if underpayment is suspected. |
Spain | YES | Labour and Social Security Inspectorate (ITSS) / TGSS | Law 23/2015 and General Social Security Law | Inspection planning, complaints, referrals or other information. No fixed employer audit cycle. |
Sweden | YES | Swedish Tax Agency | Tax Procedure Act (2011:1244) | Tax audits may cover employer contributions. No general fixed cycle. |
Iceland | YES | Icelandic Revenue and Customs | Tax legislation and Social Security Tax Act (Act No. 113/1990) | Employer payroll and social security tax can be audited. No fixed audit cycle identified. Detailed selection criteria not conclusively verified. |
Liechtenstein | YES | AHV-IV-FAK | Art. 28(2) AHVG; Art. 63(1) AHVV | Periodic employer audits by auditors with access to relevant accounting and personnel records. |
Norway | YES | Norwegian Tax Administration | Tax Administration Act and National Insurance legislation | Tax / contribution audits plus automated controls of monthly A-melding data. No fixed audit cycle. |
Switzerland | YES | AHV compensation funds / audit bodies | Art. 68 AHVG; Art. 162 AHVV | Statutory periodic employer audits. No fixed four-year cycle comparable to Germany; intervals depend on the Swiss audit framework. |
United Kingdom | YES | HMRC | Finance Act 2008, Schedule 36 and NIC legislation | Risk-based Employer Compliance Checks. No fixed cycle. NIC treatment may be reviewed as part of the audit. |
